{"id":711,"date":"2017-07-18T22:21:58","date_gmt":"2017-07-18T22:21:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/paragonnz.com\/?p=711"},"modified":"2017-07-25T22:14:00","modified_gmt":"2017-07-25T22:14:00","slug":"property-drug-testing-and-more-in-our-latest-newsletter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/paragonnz.com\/property-drug-testing-and-more-in-our-latest-newsletter\/","title":{"rendered":"Property Drug Testing and more in our Latest Newsletter"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Property Drug testing \u2013 a review of current tests and supporting documents<\/p>\n
Property owners are still being exposed to a lot of hype about Meth testing and to assist our readers we thought we would go over again some of the types of tests currently being performed and importantly the need for an evidential trail.<\/p>\n
There are two types of tests, presumptive and forensic. <\/p>\n
A presumptive test is where a swab is rubbed over a surface and then the swab is exposed to a fluid or spray that turns a certain colour or lines depending on the product. While a good \u201cindication\u201d, that is all it is and there is no way of telling any level of contamination.<\/p>\n
Forensic testing comes in various forms; the first level is a wipe that is sent to a laboratory for testing. Typically, this first \u201cpresumptive wipe\u201d will be wiped against multiple surfaces and rooms, again as an indicator only. The difference here though is the independent laboratory will provide a reading and although this is only across the entire surfaces wiped, if there is a reading above the accepted levels then you need to go to level two.<\/p>\n
To establish the actual level of contamination in a property, each room or area needs to be wiped using the 100cm square test, meaning a house would require many wipes. This is usually done following the presumptive wipe, due to costs.<\/p>\n
For remediation, a full forensic test might be necessary by a qualified forensic scientist, likely $2,000 plus for a standard house.<\/p>\n
It is now industry standard in real estate or landlord matters that a \u201cpresumptive wipe\u201d, sent to a laboratory is the minimum, and for good reasons.<\/p>\n
We mentioned accreditation, and the fact there is none. Incredible as it seems, the property testing industry has taken off faster than the regulations governing testing although that is being worked on now by a panel. However, only the testing of people has an NZQA qualification currently, most players in the property testing market will boast they have internal or independent accreditation.<\/p>\n
With the lack of testing accreditation, the fall back positon must be two things; (a) the independent laboratory and (b) a detailed report. At least if an issue arises you will be able to provide a report to show that a test was performed, by who, what equipment was used, how it was used and a laboratory report giving a reading. If you don\u2019t have this, then any subsequent tenant or buyer might claim the property was contaminated before they moved in and the results would be horrific. We are aware of one landlord who not only failed to get any rent arrears but got ordered to pay for all the furnishings and clothes of the tenant who claimed a resulting contamination after moving in. <\/p>\n
Hints:
\n\u2022\tBefore engaging a tester, ask what type of test they perform and if they provide a comprehensive report.
\n\u2022\tIf the test is to be relied upon, then a forensic laboratory wipe should be the minimum.
\n\u2022\tTest every time you change tenant and provide a copy to the next tenant, as that proves the property clean when they took possession. Insist on being able to re-test during an occupancy, this is standard terms and conditions nowadays.<\/p>\n
<\/a> What peaked our interest is the comment that he was caught discussing \u201chow to deal with a private investigator\u201d. http:\/\/www.stuff.co.nz\/world\/australia\/75544671\/notorious-conman-peter-foster-raided-over-alleged-murder-plot<\/a><\/p>\n You see Foster has a very strong hatred of PI\u2019s resulting from his experience with Paragon in 2006 when we caught him red handed running a scam in Fiji. http:\/\/www.radionz.co.nz\/international\/pacific-news\/165647\/serial-conman-under-police-guard-in-fiji-hospital<\/a> When captured he tried to escape by jumping into a river, resulting in him being run over by the Police in a boat. This time, his mates have dubbed him in. My view is that Mr Foster is no \u201cking\u201d he is simply a criminal with no moral compass. <\/p>\n<\/a> <\/p>\n Missing Person \u2013 When to bring in a PI ?
\nKing Con is at it again
\nKnown as \u201cKing Con\u201d and \u201cThe King of Stings\u201d, Mr Peter Foster has led an incredible life of crime. His latest scam $28m in Australia. http:\/\/www.couriermail.com.au\/news\/queensland\/crime-and-justice\/peter-foster-dobbed-in-by-associates-in-lead-up-to-arrest-over-alleged-gambling-scam\/news-story\/2b9d45fc244bd7a88b6f3899f80f8a76<\/a><\/p>\n
\nVirtually every week the media report on a person going missing, often just for a few days and more than often they are located safe or unfortunately having passed away. The number of long-term missing person\u2019s cases throughout the world is still increasing, despite the advances in technology and social media. In 2013 it was reported that 607 people go missing without a trace every day and in the past 20 years some 4,432,880 people were reported missing without a trace in the world.<\/p>\n